ارائه الگوی بهره برداری بهینه از سرمایه انسانی دانشی و مشاغل دانش بنیان با رویکرد توسعه کسب و کارهای ورزشی در استان تهران

قربانی, محمدحسین; صابری, علی; صفری جعفرلو, حمید رضا

doi:10.22034/ntsmj.2024.2029543.1002

ارائه الگوی بهره برداری بهینه از سرمایه انسانی دانشی و مشاغل دانش بنیان با رویکرد توسعه کسب و کارهای ورزشی در استان تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

محمدحسین قربانی ¹

علی صابری ²

حمید رضا صفری جعفرلو ³

¹ گروه مدیریت و سیاستگذاری در ورزش، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران.

² گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدگان مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

³ گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه جهرم، جهرم، ایران.

10.22034/ntsmj.2024.2029543.1002

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین الگوی بهره‌برداری بهینه از سرمایه انسانی دانشی و مشاغل دانش بنیان با رویکرد توسعه کسب و کارهای ورزشی در استان تهران بوده است.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر، به صورت کیفی و منطبق بر رویکرد داده بنیاد بود. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی مدیران اجرایی، کارشناسان، اساتید دانشگاهی، نخبگان اقتصاد، اشتغال و کارآفرینی ورزش و آگاه به اقتصاد ورزش و نیروی انسانی در ورزش استان تهران تشکیل داده است. جهت نمونه گیری از الگوی گلوله برفی و تا رسیدن به حد اشباع بهره گرفته شده است. در این راستا، پس از انجام مصاحبه با 19 مشارکت کننده، اشباع نظری حاصل شد. در راستای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از رویکرد داده بنیاد و از الگوی پیشنهادی استراس و کوربن (1990) استفاده شده و از روش کدگذاری جهت شناسایی هر یک از شرایط عِلی، شرایط زمینه ای، شرایط مداخله گر، راهبردها و پی آمدها بهره گرفته شد.
یافته: در این پژوهش، پس از انجام مصاحبه و کد گذاری داده ها، در نهایت تعداد 108 کد مستقل اولیه ایجاد شد. نکته‌ای که در این کدها بیش از همه مورد تکرار و توجه قرار گرفته است، توسعه کسب و کارهای دانش بنیان ورزشی بود که به عنوان محور بررسی عوامل عِلی، زمینه ای، مداخله گر، راهبردها و پی آمدها قرار گرفت. از بین کدهای مستخرج، 23 کد مربوط به عوامل عِلی، 20 کد زمینه ای، 17 کد مداخله گر، 28 کد راهبردها و 20 کد مربوط به پی آمدهای توسعه کسب و کارهای دانش بنیان ورزشی بوده است.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: یافته های این پژوهش می تواند به عنوان یک الگوی مناسب جهت بهره برداری بهینه از منابع انسانی دانشی و همچنین جهت توسعه مشاغل و کسب و کارهای دانش بنیان ورزشی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سرمایه انسانی دانشی

مشاغل دانش بنیان

کسب و کارهای ورزشی

استان تهران

عنوان مقاله English

The Pattern of Optimal Utilization of Knowledge-Based Human Resources and Jobs with the Approach of Developing Sports Businesses in Tehran Province

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Hossein Ghorbani ¹

Ali Saberi ²

Hamidreza Safari Jafarlo ³

¹ Department of Management and Policy Making in Sports, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Sports Management, School of Management and Accounting, Farabi Campus of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Jahrom University, Jahrom , Iran

چکیده English

Introduction: The aim of the current research was to determine the pattern of optimal utilization of knowledge-based human resources and jobs with the approach of developing sports businesses in Tehran province.
Methods: The research method was qualitative and consistent with the grounded theory. The statistical community includes all executives, experts, and university professors, elites of economics, employment and sports entrepreneurship and knowledgeable about sports economics and human resources in sports in Tehran province. For sampling, the snowball pattern has been used until the saturation limit is reached. In this regard, theoretical saturation was achieved after conducting interviews with 19 participants. In order to data analysis, the theory derived from the data and the model proposed by Strauss and Korbin (1990) were used, and the coding method was used to identify each factors of the causal, contextual, intervening, strategies and the outcomes.
Results: In this research, after conducting interviews and coding the data, 108 initial independent codes were created. The point that has been repeated and noticed the most in these codes was the development of knowledge-based sports businesses, which was placed as the focal point of examining causal, contextual, intervening, strategies and the outcomes. 23 codes related to causal factors, 20 contextual codes, 17 intervening codes, 28 strategy codes and 20 codes related to the outcomes of the development of knowledge-based sports businesses were identified.
Conclusion: The findings of this research can be used as a desirable model for the optimal use of knowledge-based human resources as well as for the development of sports knowledge-based jobs and businesses.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Intellectual Human Capital

Knowledge-Based Jobs

Sports Businesses

Tehran Province

References

1. Curado, Ca,. Oliveira, M and Maçada, A. (2011). Mapping knowledge management authoring patterns and practices, African Journal of Business Management Vol. 5(22), pp. 9137-9153, 3.

2. Curado, C. & Bontis, N. (2007). “Managing intellectual capital: the MIC Matrix”, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 3 Nos 2/3, pp. 316-28.

3. Villasalero, M. (2017). A resource-based analysis of realized knowledge relatedness in diversified firms. Journal of Business Research, 71, 114-124.

4. Eugenio, L., Damian, C., Tomás, B., & Santiago, M. (2016). Classification of micro, small and medium enterprises (M-SME) based on their available levels of knowledge. Technovation, 47(3), 59–69.

5. Erickson, G. S., & Rothberg, H. N. (2015). Knowledge asset in services across industries and across time. Investigaciones en Europa, 21, 58-64.

6. Levermore, R and Beacom, A. (2010). Sport and International Development, Aaron, Development in Practice 20(7):908-911.

7. Chelladurai, P., & Madella, A. (2006). Human resource management in Olympic sport organizations. Leeds: Human Kinetics. P: 6.

8. Khasawneh, S. (2011). Human capital planning in higher education institutions: A strategic human resource development. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(6), 534-544. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541111159040.

9. Cohen, S. and Kaimenakis, N. (2007), "Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge‐intensive SMEs", The Learning Organization, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710739417

10. Robinson, S. (1986) ‘Analyzing the Information Economy: Tools and Techniques’, Information Processing and Management. Information Processing and Management, 22(3), pp. 183–202.

11. Drucker, P. (1999) ‘Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge’, California Management Review. California Management Review, 41(2), pp. 79–94. doi: 10.2307/41165987.

12. Figurska, I. (2015). Personal Aspects of Knowledge Management. A. Sokół. (ed.). Managing Diversity in the Organization. Creativity-Knowledge-Competence-Innovation-Trust. London: Sciemcee Publishing London. 79–106. ISBN 978-0-9928772-3-1.

13. Mckeen, J. D. & Staples, D. S. (2001). Knowledge Managers: Who They Are and What They Do. Queen’s School of Business, Kingston. (Online). [cit. 2015.03.15]. Aviable at: http://providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/knowledge_managers_-_who_they_are_and_what_they_do.pdf.

14. Pugliese, R., Bortoluzzi, G. & Zupic, I. (2016). Putting process on track: Empirical research on start-ups’ growth drivers. Management Decision, 54(7), 1633-1648.

15. Rojas, F. & Huergo, E. (2016). Characteristics of entrepreneurs and public support for NTBFs. Small Business Economics, 1-20.

16. Groenewegen, G. & De Langen, F. (2012). Critical success factors of the survival of start-ups with a radical innovation. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 2(3), 155-171.

17. Díaz-Santamaría, Carlos, and Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal. )2021(. Econometric estimation of the factors that influence startup success. Sustainability 13: 2242.

18. Santisteban, J and Mauricio, D (2017). Systematic literature review of critical success factorshttps://www.abacademies.org/articles/systematic-literature-review-of-critical-success-factors-of-information-technology-startups-6638.html of Information Technology startups, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal 23(2):1-23

19. Sevilla-Bernardo, J.; Sanchez-Robles, B.; Herrador-Alcaide, T.C (2022). Success Factors of Startups in Research Literature within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Adm. Sci. 12, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030102 102.

20. Pirjamadi, S; Honari, H; Kargar, G & Shabani Bahar, Gh. (2021). Designing the Model of Sustainable Knowledge Based Sport Companies in Iran. Sport Management Studies, 13(66), 141-170. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22089/smrj.2019.7752.2683.

21. Manev, G and Jakimovsk, J (2017). Role of knowledge management in sport organizations, School of Business, N: 2. P: 150-171.

22. Göksu, S., T., & Çavuşoğlu, S., B., (2024). Start-Up projeleri ve yatrimlari içerisinde spor: ekosistem raporlarinin incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 21(1), 73-95. doi:10.14687/jhs.v21i1.6455

23. Qin Y, Rocha CM and Morrow S (2022) Knowledge management in sport mega-events: A systematic literature review. Front. Sports Act. Living 4:1056390. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1056390.

24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc. P:182

25. Ditizio, A. A., (2016). "Nature and Characteristics of the Sport Industry and its Current Trends Impacting the https://ideas.repec.org/s/igg/jeco00.htmlIndustry," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 14(4), 13-27.

26. Plunkett. J W. (2011). Plunkett's Sports Industry Almanac 2011, p: 18-22, Plunkett Research, Ltd.

27. Aversa P., Furnari S., Haefliger S. (2015). Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in formula one racing, 2005–2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24: 655-676.

28. Carlos D., Marta P. O., & Carlos R. A. (2016). "Entrepreneurship during economic crisis: success factors and paths to failure". J. Bus. Res. 69 5366–5370.

29. Noudehi, M., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). Identifying and Ranking the Components of Sports Business Development In Golestan Province. Sports Marketing Studies, 3(3), 128-99. doi: 10.22034/sms.2022.62417. (in Persian).

30. Azimzadeh, S. M., Ehsani, M., Kordnaeij, A. A., & Kozechian, H. (2014). Identifying a conceptual model for starting-up small and medium sized sport enterprises. Sport Management Studies, 6(22), 189-208. (in Persian).

31. Nová J. (2015). Developing the entrepreneurial competencies of sport management students. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences.174:3916-24.

32. Patatas JM, De Bosscher V, Derom I, De Rycke J. Managing parasport: An investigation of sport policy factors and stakeholders influencing para-athletes’ career pathways. Sport Management Review, vol. 23(5), 937-951.

33. García-Fernández, Jerónimo & Gálvez-Ruiz, Pablo & Velez Colon, Luisa & Ortega-Gutierrez, Jaime & Fernandez, Jesus. (2018). exploring fitness center consumer loyalty: Differences of non-profit and low-cost business models is Spain. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. , 31:1, 1042-1058.

34. Talebi, M., nourbakhsh, P., zarei, A., & Noorbakhsh, M. (2023). Designing a Model and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting the Formation of Sport Start-Ups. Sport Management Studies, 15(78), 17-46. doi: 10.22089/smrj.2020.9341.3168. (in Persian).

35. Beatrix, F. Szabolcs, C. Kézai, P. K. (2022). Sports startups as sports innovations. Selye e-studies. (2), 45-58.

36. Schüler, Diana; Suhalitca, Mihaela; Pascha, Werner; Oh, Keun-yeob (2020) : Government policies for start-ups in Korea and its regions: Motives, mechanisms and major obstacles, Working Papers on East Asian Studies, No. 127/2020, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies (IN-EAST), Duisburg.p:4-36.

37. Bakhtiyari, Sadegh and Shayeste, Afsaneh. (2011). Investigating the impact of improving the business environment on economic growth in selected countries with an emphasis on Iran. Financial Economics (Financial Economics and Development), 6(19), 175-204. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/229095/fa.

38. Bachtiar, P.P. et al. (2023). Indonesia’s Technology Startups, Voices From The Ecosystem. P:2, Asian Development Bank.

39. Ziakis C., Vlachopoulou, M, & Petridis, K. (2022). Start-Up Ecosystem (StUpEco): A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Research, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Volume 8, Issue 1 (35), ISSN 2199-8531, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010035.

40. Sarpira, M., Najafzadeh, R., BarghiMoghadam, J., & janani, H. (2022). Analyzing the fields of business creation and development in the sports industry and explaining the facilitator factors. Sport Management Journal,-. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2022.338269.2897. (in Persian).