تحلیل رویکرد تصمیم گیری بر اساس الگوی کارنگی در داوران نخبه فوتسال و فوتبال آسیا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری تخصصی گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
10.22034/ntsmj.2024.2029973.1016
چکیده
هدف از انجام این پژوهش تحلیل رویکرد تصمیم گیری بر اساس الگوی کارنگی در داوران نخبه فوتبال و فوتسال آسیا بود. روش تحقیق توصیفی و از نوع پیمایشی بوده که به صورت میدانی اجرا شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل داوران نخبه فوتبال و فوتسال آسیا بودند که از بین آنها تعداد 292 پاسخ دهنده در پژوهش شرکت کردند. به منظور جمع آوری داده ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته تصمیم گیری بر پایه مدل کارنگی که روایی آن توسط نظرات اصلاحی 12 تن از متخصصان مدیریت ورزشی و پایایی آن با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 82/0 به دست آمد استفاده شد. از شاخص های توصیفی (فراوانی و درصد فراوانی) و آزمون های کلموگروف اسمیرونف، تحلیل واریانس یک طرفه، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، فریدمن و تحلیل مسیر در نرم افزارهای آماری SPSS نسخه 16 و EQS نسخه 6.2 جهت تحلیل داده ها استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد بین تصمیم‌گیری داوران نخبه فوتبال و فوتسال آسیا با سن و سابقه داوری رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. همچنین تفاوت عملکرد تصمیم‌گیری بین داوران و کمک داوران فوتبال معنادار بوده به طوریکه کمک داوران فوتبال از میانگین نمرات بالاتری برخوردار هستند. از طرفی دیگر عوامل فردی (12/19=T-Value ، 87/0=β) و سازمانی (06/17=T-Value ، 83/0=β) تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر تصمیم گیری داوران داشتند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد ترتیب اولویت در تصمیم گیری داوران به ترتیب فردی و سازمانی می باشد. لذا پیشنهاد می شود داوران نخبه با عوامل مختلف محیطی و سازمانی پیرامون خود احساس نزدیکی و پیوند قوی داشته باشند، تا با جلب حمایت های آنها بتوانند سطح عملکرد تصمیم گیری فردی و سازمانی را افزایش دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the decision-making approach based on Carnegie's model in Asian elite futsal and football referees

نویسندگان English

Ramin Iraji Noghondar 1
Hamin Ghasemi 2
Abolfazl Farahani 2
1 Ph.D Sport Management Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Sport Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The aim of this research was to analyze the decision-making approach based on Carnegie's model in Asian elite football and futsal referees. The research method is descriptive and survey type, which was implemented in the field. The statistical population of this research included elite football and futsal referees in Asia, among whom 292 respondents participated in the research. In order to collect data, a researcher-made decision-making questionnaire based on the Carnegie model was used, the validity of which was obtained by the corrective opinions of 12 sports management experts, and its reliability was obtained using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82. Descriptive indices (prevalence and frequency percentage) and Kolmogorov Smironov tests, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, Friedman and path analysis were used in statistical software SPSS version 16 and EQS version 6.2 for data analysis. The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between the decision-making of Asian elite soccer and futsal referees with age and experience of refereeing. Also, the difference in decision-making performance between football referees and assistant referees is significant, so that football assistant referees have higher average scores. On the other hand, individual factors (β=0.87, T-Value=19.12) and organizational factors (β=0.83, T-Value=17.06) had a positive and significant effect on judges' decision making. Also, the results showed that the order of priority in the judges' decision-making is individual and organizational. Therefore, it is suggested that elite referees feel close and have a strong bond with various environmental and organizational factors around them, so that by attracting their support, they can increase the level of individual and organizational decision-making performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Judging
responsibility
performance
competition
sports rules
1. Bloß N, Loffing F, Schorer J, Büsch D. Impact of psychological and physical load on the decision-making of top-class handball referees. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2022 May 4;22(3):352-69.
2. Karafil AY. Examination of Football Referees' Attitudes Towards Video Assistant Referee System (VAR) by Q Method. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2023 Feb 2;8(1):99-112.
3. Samuel RD, Galily Y, Guy O, Sharoni E, Tenenbaum G. A decision-making simulator for soccer referees. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2019 Aug;14(4):480-9.
4. Nazarudin MN, Majeed AP, Maliki AB, Abdullah MR, Kuan G, Musa RM. Disciplinary measures defining referee activity in top-European football leagues: A cross-sectional investigation. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(3).
5. Ghayebzadeh S, Zardoshtian S, Amiri E, Giboin LS, Machado DG. Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Boosts Decision Making and Functional Impulsivity in Female Sports Referees. Life. 2023 May 5;13(5):1131.
6. Grandperrin Y, Grosprêtre S, Nicolier M, Gimenez P, Vidal C, Haffen E, Bennabi D. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on sports performance for two profiles of athletes (power and endurance)(COMPETE): a protocol for a randomised, crossover, double blind, controlled exploratory trial. Trials. 2020 Dec;21:1-4.
7. Pizzera A, Laborde S, Lahey J, Wahl P. Influence of physical and psychological stress on decision-making performance of soccer referees. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2022 Sep 17;40(18):2037-46.
8. Bloß N, Schorer J, Loffing F, Büsch D. Physical load and referees’ decision-making in sports games: A scoping review. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2020 Mar;19(1):149.
9. Spitz J, Wagemans J, Memmert D, Williams AM, Helsen WF. Video assistant referees (VAR): The impact of technology on decision making in association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021 Jan 17;39(2):147-53.
10. Schnyder U, Hossner EJ. Psychological issues in football officiating: An interview study with top-level referees. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS). 2016 Sep 27;1:004-.
11. Luis del Campo V, Morenas Martin J, Pizzera A. Effects of past and current motor experiences as soccer players in decision-making of amateur soccer referees. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2022 Jul 4;20(4):1102-16.
12. Russell S, Renshaw I, Davids K. Sport arbitration as an emergent process in a complex system: Decision-making variability is a marker of expertise in national-level football referees. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2022 May 4;34(3):539-63.
13. Greve HR. Structuring the situation: Organizational goals trigger and direct decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023 Mar 29;14:1140408.
14. Kahiyah HA. Administrative personality styles and their relationship to the Carnegie model of decision-making. Journal of Administration and Economics. 2021(129).
15. Skirbekk S. Video assistant referee (VAR), gender and football refereeing: A scoping review. Soccer & Society. 2024 Apr 2;25(3):360-77.
16. Abdo Hassan A. Psychological immunity and its relationship to decision-making among football referees. Beni-Suef Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences (BJPESS). 2024 Mar 1;7(14):33-67.
17. Van Biemen T, Oudejans RR, Savelsbergh GJ, Zwenk F, Mann DL. Into the eyes of the referee: A comparison of elite and sub-elite football referees’ on-field visual search behaviour when making foul judgements. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023 Feb;18(1):78-90.
18. Johansen BT, Haugen T, Erikstad MK. Coping with external stressors in handball and football elite refereeing: The relationship with referee efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.;4(1):20-6.
19. Franco Lima R, Camões M, Manuel Clemente F, de Oliveira Castro H, Silva B. Exploring the motivations and expectations in the amateur football referee. Journal of Physical Education (24482455). 2022 Jan 1;33.
18. McEwan GP, Unnithan VB, Easton C, Arthur R. Training practices and perceptions of soccer officials: Insights from the Referee Training Activity Questionnaire. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023 Aug;18(4):1173-89.

19. Alfonso CR, Muñoz-Arjona C, Onetti-Onetti W. National vs. Non-National Soccer Referee: Physiological, Physical, and Psychological Characteristics. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2022 Oct 2;93(4):804-12.

20. Castillo-Rodríguez A, Muñoz-Arjona C, Onetti-Onetti W. National vs. Non-National Soccer Referee: Physiological, Physical, and Psychological Characteristics. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2022 Oct 2;93(4):804-12.

21. Sérgio M, Oliveira EP, Monteiro D, Travassos B. The Portuguese referee performance model. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2021 Oct;16(5):1117-25.

23. Webb T, O’Gorman J, Markham L. Striving for excellence: Talent identification and development in English football refereeing. European Sport Management Quarterly. 2023 Mar 4;23(2):351-69.
24. Aragao e Pina J, Passos AM, Carvalho H, Travis Maynard M. To be or not to be an excellent football referee: Different experts’ viewpoints. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019 Mar 19;37(6):692-700.
25. Richlan F, Thürmer JL, Braid J, Kastner P, Leitner MC. Subjective experience, self-efficacy, and motivation of professional football referees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023 May 8;10(1):1-5.
26. Płoszaj K, Firek W, Czechowski M. The Referee as an educator: Assessment of the quality of referee–players interactions in competitive youth handball. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Jun;17(11):3988.
27. Wanza L, Nkuraru JK. Influence of change management on employee performance: A case of university of Eldoret, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2016 Apr;7(4):190-9.
28. Beiderbeck D, Evans N, Frevel N, Schmidt SL. The impact of technology on the future of football–A global Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023 Feb 1;187:122186.